Quote:
Originally Posted by Firegazer
Obviously we've seen this with Jack, but this has also been done before with Sam (CBB13) and Chris (BB15), in attempts to save Jim & Liz, and Pav & Zoe respectively (both of which failed)
I'm just wondering why they do this? Surely they wouldn't want to make it obvious that they were manipulating the show? I don't understand!
We really need a statement from Channel 5, and perhaps a clarification of the rules/format, too.
|
The general rule since BB14 has been the three or more with the most noms are up.. So Chris shouldn't have been up in Week 8 last year. However, in Week 3, before the Save and Replace, it should have been Chris, Danielle, Ash, Jale and Christopher up, but they also put Winston, Marlon and Steven up.
However I think it's absolutely awful, and the 4 in 4 out this year is literally the worst thing they've ever done... Not only unfair, but so blatantly done to suit themselves... Danielle's eviction was awful, but at least it wasn't blatant manipulation!