[ItWasJustBanter]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

He never was the innocent hero, in fact he wasn't a hero at all for me.

He firstly got huffed and angry with Nikki in the bunker, she even had to go over and try to console him after he had moaned in the diary room too.

Then he cowardly always tried to backtrack from the noms they made,blaming the others for the decisions as if he had nothing at all to do with any of them really.

He then hammered Helen and Marc fro Jade being nominated when in fact it was Helen and Nikki who led the nominations of Jade.

He met someone and 2 days later was in bed with them and almost talking about them as a 'girlfriend'.really odd that to me.

He wanted to leave early on after going in, then decided not to once he got into an involvement with Jade.

Jade gets evicted, then he starts his really bad temper again, taking off and bizarrely throwing shoes behind him,what was that all about.
Then come the big one, his major confrontation with Helen and her 'wrong' terminologies she used at him, however in my thoughts as in others, who were looking at him, I wondered, from his really smouldering and sinister expressions,just what would he possibly do to her if there were no cameras on them and they were alone.

Then he clearly must have known, that he unjustifiably attacked Marc,especially as to Jade,
Which soon afterwards saw him cowardly not go and sound off to BB as he had regularly done before but go and draw attention to himself by climbing over a wall, to what I still say was a very 'conveniently placed' ladder.

Making way firstly for Aisleyne to have a place in the house by his leaving and also to leave the blame for his going on Helen and Marc because of the arguments, which he actually often started too.

All that done,I firmly believe, because he wanted to follow Jade,had she not been evicted,he would never have gone anywhere,or wanted to, no matter what was going on in the house.

To me he showed himself up bigtime, he came across as cowardly and a wimp and also he did look really sinister in that argument and he could come out with some vile stuff of his own when it suited him too.
Good riddance to him,he was painted the better guy by BB in all aspects of 'conflicts' in the house but as is often the case, were we to be ever able to see all the goings on, the realities may be very different indeed.

I would now believe Helen more than Brian.
Because she has demonstrated rightly and wrongly, she is basically honest,he backtracked on so much,despite the cameras, that he is the one more likely to be doubted as to his version of events.

A hero,not in my book.

He's made a career out of showcasing himself to be a complete gormless moron. Why would they take his opinion into account anyway?

"Oh I know, let's listen to what the idiot suggests"