Quote:
Originally Posted by REDCROP
America is a massive country ....no way channel 5 cud stand the expense of a show thats on every night for 2 months without the public paying to vote
i think they should stop calling them house mates, they're not mates...they should call them game players...and ask the public who they think has been the best game player each week...instead of who do you think is your favourite mate...maybe, just maybe, the idiots who keep robbing us of the best game players will finally start to understand the actual concept of the show......and stop sending outsiders in so than came tell Rylan who they think is NICE
|
Big Brother in the US airs three nights a week but they have live feed, and it works pretty well. The episodes just consolidate what you already know and show you the competitions.
They will never scrap the public vote entirely but there's ways to incorporate a more strategic format as well as giving the public
some influence but without a direct affect on who is evicted. Just have the HoH nominate three people, the public can vote to
save (key word) one of them post-Veto, and then the housemates can vote to evict as normal. It would actually add an extra element to the game because the HoH would run the risk of nominating a big target, the public saving them and then that person going after the person who nommed them.
Then give the public one of the jury votes and you're sorted. They can still have a public vote, just in a different manner.