Quote:
Originally Posted by ThriceShy
What if their actions are criminal outside the house?
And can you accept that people might want to judge on different things than you do?
I don't agree that the point of the programme is to solely judge them on what goes on inside the house. If that were true then why, for example, were cameras sent to carole's house in BB8 and the resulting video played to the house to show that she wasn't really a clean freak outside of the house?
|
If their actions were of a serious criminal offence then I don't think the producers would have casted them quite frankly. I am most certainly not about to be drawn out into a discussion of this incident because it would go against everything I'm saying but I will make one point - yes it absolutely sounds abhorrent and she should have been prosecuted for it. However, it is now irrelevant to her actions on a TV show that we're watching for 48 minutes a night. With a few exceptions, if someone has committed a crime and has served their sentence, that is it, they should be entitled to do pretty much whatever they like (again, with a few exceptions), and that includes taking part in a TV show.
Yes I can, and you're going to have to accept that I think it's irrelevant, unnecessary, obsessive and petty to do so.
Because they wanted to show Carole up and start an argument
inside the house? I don't remember this incident but clearly the point of this wasn't to make the viewers go 'ew Carole what a dirty bitch at home get her out!!!!!!' because
we aren't living with her, not at home nor in the Big Brother house, all that matters is her actions inside the
television studio that is the house on the
television show that is Big Brother. Nothing else.