|
User banned
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: leeds
Posts: 10,830
Favourites (more):
|
|
|
User banned
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: leeds
Posts: 10,830
Favourites (more):
|
Ive read all these posts and on the one hand people are saying these contestants can bring scammer identities and back stories to the table and if they get through the net then fine, but are we expected as normal people, to simply disregard the fact that someone has slipped through the net with a scammer backstory and treat them with respect based on what they do on the show.
Sorry but the definition of a conman is someone who is generally believable until the dirty deed is done and I for one, don't like being conned. If all you watch this show for is blood, guts and thunder, then fine, but some of us like to see fun, interaction, arguments and good clean storylines with a bit of spice thrown in, not the likes of slimy characters like Danny, Chloe and Joel with Nick and harry on the fringe of cringe and scam.
|