Quote:
Originally Posted by Withano
I asked on another thread but it'll get lost in the comments and i really want to know the answer because i don't see the similarities that people have drawn.
Chloe got a little mad at people for spending money which was not theirs to spend.. How is it the same as Chloe choosing to not give money which was hers to give.
Its not the same. I would have done the exact same as Chloe, it was my 5k to give or keep and i would have got a bit miffed at others recklessly buying stupid ****, its not their money to spend.. if somebody could explain why her and i are hypocrites, id be grateful! It was her money to give and she chose not to  |
....hmm, I haven't seen it all/I haven't seen her getting £5000..?..anyways though, just going on what you're saying, I do agree with you that 'hypocrite' wouldn't seem accurate as such but I can still understand why that's being called just because she has been so vocal and judgemental of others..for me I guess there's a difference between 'an offer' from the prize fund which is something that is a treat for any of them right now...I don't know, I just personally think that they never seem to really have 'hardships' in terms of treats...they get so much outside contact anyway, the smokers all seem to have cigarettes, you don't really see them struggling with their basic budgets..?..etc, etc....but with Chloe, to be offered or have taken £5000 as something that was not a treat for her short time left in the house but something that she would and could use outside of the house to me seems not the same thing at all...and only one of them can win what is left of the prize fund and BB mess up that prize fund so much anyway so I think a lot of people would just accept the £5000 and say thank you/I've earned that, type thing....