Quote:
Originally Posted by LiamBB
... for those of us who'd like to see Big Brother take a step back towards a 'back to basics' type show.
I wasn't a Chloe fan, and I was pretty underwhelmed by the final. But imagine what the producers are thinking right now, try and see this result through their eyes. After weeks of desperate tactics to keep 'controversial' contestants in the house, and putting in 'controversial' non contestants too. And their constant house rock-ing, explosive twists, designed purely to cause confrontation and fighting. In the end, the nice boring one who sat around not doing much won. I mean she didn't even have a bloody showmance! They're either scratching their heads wondering if the viewers are all on acid, or maybe they'll consider that their priorities need to change with regards to how they approach designing the show. I'm not saying we'll suddenly get a house full of Chloes, that would be terrible! But they have to be able to recognise that the public have gone completely against the wishes of the producers this year. If anything was ever going to push them into reconsidering their format, surely it would be someone like Chloe winning?
|
Good stuff here.
I agree. Chloe was not seeking fame. Whatever her faults, she was there to make a better life for herself by winning some money. Unlike many of the others with agents looking to advance a modeling, acting, music, rapping, sexual services etc careers. Glad a more relatable, flawed person won.