[REDCROP]

But maybe because of 4 in 4 out, next years lot won't feel so safe and won't play it safe like so many did this year...that is what i am trying to say but no one seems to understand....what a shame, i'm trying to be positive....yes 4 in 4 out was not managed very professionally and yes it robbed 4 housemates of a chance to prove themselves, but they did have 2 weeks to prove themselves and ironically the 2 who had given the least were the 2 the public kept in...but if 4 in 4 out had taken place last year then for sure Danny, Christian and Chloe would not have gone in and just coasted along the way they did this year...i think that 4 in 4 out this year will unnerve the housemates who apply for next year and maybe, just maybe, they will up their game...it's something good that may actually come out of something disappointing...it's about projecting a positive impact this years disjointed show may have on next years show....maybe ch 5 need to refine the new ideas and think them thru more but i believe that creating instability and unpredictabilty is the best thing they could do....if the show reverts back to the tried and tested and now tired formula of yesteryear then it will just make it even easier for housemates to predict the game and even easier for people like half of this years finalists to hide in the wings for the duration of the show and only condescend to pop their heads out in the final weeks when the money is on the table...the premise of the show used to that big brother had control and the contestants couldn't predict what would happen next...in recent years the housemates have had control and even a blind man on a galloping horse would be able to predict what was coming next...i think its a good thing to shock the housemates and leave them feeling unsettled...it could have been implemented better, no doubt, but i believe it's heading in the right direction..