Quote:
Originally Posted by LukeB
I know 
like instead of shoving Helen and Ashleigh down the viewers throats, show the public someone like Christopher(who would have been a better winner)
and instead of Marc being shoved down publics throats and his 'banter yay' give Sam, Cristian and others a chance to show what they really like.
Producers being bias is what kills the show. |
Spot on. I think CBB15 is another great example of this. Instead of shoving Perez and Katie Hopkins (both repulsive human beings and housemates) down our throats, show us Katie Price, Kavana, Calum, Patsy for instance who were all branded boring because they were fillers in an ongoing feud between Cuntkins and Hellton which damaged the series.
I think the first 2 weeks of BB16 (pre 4in4out), the editing was fair and we all got to see each and every housemate. It felt so natural and fresh. Then they messed it up.
Thats the thing with Channel 5, once they have a housemate who is loud, confrontational, divisive, or brings in controversy, they aquire a certain love for them, and begin to milk them for all their worth, when there's really nothing there to begin with. They did that with Helen, Ashleigh, Perez, Hopkins, Gary, James, and Marc. That's why all those housemates I've named happened to be in series which sucked (bar CBB15, but got tiresome in the 2nd half because of it), because they centre the whole show around one or two people and it's ****ing boring.