[Jamie89]

Hmm, the point of the article seems to be that there's a hypocrisy amongst the signatories of the Trump petition. But I imagine that most of them would agree that these people should also have been banned (it looks like most of them have been now). But I think the reason Trump's petition has so many signatories is just because he has a much higher profile, whereas the men in this article will have gone relatively unnoticed by the general population because they didn't have as much press attention. I don't think it's necessarily a case of hypocrisy, unless the signatories are outwardly saying that Trump should be banned and these men shouldn't.