Quote:
Originally posted by nodisharmony
Quote:
Originally posted by spacebandit
You have once again confirmed the context in which you made the post - ignore the AMERICAN torture that you not only made the initial post about, ignoring the american acts of course but lay the blame for them on other arabs, and then expanded upon it in a reply and specifically blamed arabs for it.
bait and switch - in your own thread multiple times
Your own response to being caught out that americans did the torturing and not arabs as you claimed
|
I have said, that you need to read between the lines and to be quite honest, if a couple of American's or more decide to do a terrible act, then they will have been instructed to do that.
But it all leads to the points I am making, that the Wars which are religion-motivated are happening in the middle-east right now and Abu is not from the West, is he??
So, why torture him?
For fun, or part of something much bigger.
It all points in the middle-eastern direction and the News on our TV screens is proof enough, but you keep blaming the West?? That I can't understand.
No patrotism and looking at America in a very bad light.
So, perhaps you always join the winning side? I can't believe the weak-mindnedness
Just because the Wars go on forever and life is so cheap, "So they say!!!", I guess that makes a difference for middle-easterns, or NOT? Where life seems cheap, from their point of view.....This is the argument, ya'know
and what about suicide bombers??
Now that is something very bad and almost unbelievable
Quote:
shows your true intent
Lies
Damned Lies
and Racism............Fits you like a glove
You have no real opinion or judgement, just cut and paste attempts at shock and awe that you are unable to sustain or justify when questioned on it, you can't argue your point - you are incapable of making one yourself without a hollywood movie to assist you.
When the judgement's weak,
The prejudice is strong.
Kane O'Hara
|
I don't cut & paste my replies to you or any other member, I don't need to or even attempt to, as I can't mind-read what replies I shall receive?? So that clears that assumption of yours, right up
As for judgement, i can certainly make that and quite easily, the evidence speaks for itself
The Hollywood movie, "Not Without My Daughter", was in another thread.
You are getting mixed up, as this thread proves.
nodisharmony 
|
Once again your comprehension level fails abysmally, you seem to have an almost autistic obsession with literal interpretation. Which is quite hilarious considering that you claim people need to read between the lines of your posts to understand your meaning.
No confusion on my part, unfortunately for you.
No mix up on my part - you really should get someone to read to you if you have THAT much trouble comprehending,
So you now excuse amercas torture policy thusly
Quote:
Originally posted by nodisharmony
if a couple of American's or more decide to do a terrible act
|
More proof that you do not have the remotest clue what you are talking about.
Torture is now enshrined in American Foreign Policy
America no longer adheres to the Geneva Convention
Americans who torture are now protected by their government from prosecution under Human Rights law, as torture of suspects, without charge and without evidence - on the word of a single paid informer is now US policy.
And Americans can kidnap anyone of any nationiality and torture them in camps outside of the US - they do not have to provide any evidence, you can be held indefinitely, and you have no legal recourse, and those who kidnapped you will never be brought to justice should it turn out that you are innocent and have a name that is a bit like someone they may be searching for or if someone you don't like drops a dime on you to homeland security to get rid of you - you would become a "ghost detainee" with no rights.
Amnesty International states that 90% of ghost detainees were taken on the word of paid informants, in almost all cases on the word of a single paid informant -
And you -
it is now abundantly clear exactly what you are, not that proof was needed