Quote:
Originally Posted by sampvt
The verbage he used wasn't right, but he didn't mean sexual or physical abuse which is what his haters are paralleling his words up to. He simply meant that the child would not receive what he perceives is a correct upbringing in the face of 2 men promoting homosexual acts or views and this was against his religious and ethical principles. A hell of a lot more different from physical or sexual abuse. The words Child abuse conjures up a bad feeling but can be misunderstood by the masses.
|
Unfortunately, despite a number of opportunities, we have no idea what he means because he rambles on about utter bollox whenever he's asked.
HMs are usually interviewed in one of the tabloids. Has he explained his views in one of those yet?
Btw, even your version of what he meant is still offensive.