View Single Post
Old 16-07-2007, 10:20 PM #11
spacebandit spacebandit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,163
spacebandit spacebandit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,163
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by nodisharmony


- Iraq was threatening to use WMDs against Israel

That is:- "Weapon of mass destruction" ( Nuclear, Chemical Weapons )


They could also use those weapons against "The West", right??

So, due to that, War came about, when America invaded.

BUT, BUT, BUT, you say that Iraq did not start it????

BUT, BUT, BUT, Who threatened to invade?

Who said they had WMD's????



Iraq



America had to act, just on that threat alone.....

So, Iraq should have thought things through, but Saddam doesn't wish to listen, did he??



So you see Rex, (Not so dillusional, is it?)


nodisharmony
Iraq did not have any WMD, the US and UK Governments were told that prior to the war, and it has now been proven right

Iraq did not start the war - it is simple to discover the true cause of the start of it

Iraq threatened to invade no-one. We were warned Iraq could strike at us, but we have since been informed by our "great leaders" that they were wrong. Them being wrong was no secret before the war started, in fact we now know the lied about it

You say that Iraq said they had WMD, and so its their fault. Of course they did, and here is why.

North Korea has a genocidal maniac as a leader, human rights abuses are horrific, it has nuclear weapons, and that is verified. Yet we do not invade - Why ?

We do not invade BECAUSE they have nuclear weapons.

Iraq had a genocidal maniac as a leader, supported and sponsored for many years by the United States, human rights abuses were, and still are horrific, it claimed it had WMD and was about to have a nuclear weapon. and yet we invaded - Why ?

We invaded because our governments knew there were no WMD and they thought they could win.

that is why Iraq claimed to have WMD - to try and fend off invasion.

Kim Il Jon in North Korea is arguably as bad as Saddam - we know that, but we don't invade, we don't invade because no US and UK administration would survive the slaughter of hnudreds of thousands of its troops massing to invade North Korea when Kim Il Jon nukes them, and then we nuke his people - he'll be safe miles underground in a bunker.

We have shown the world that bullies prosper, we have shown the world that evil thugs will be dispensed with, unless they have a nuclear weapon - then we will negotiate with them. bearing that in mind, it is no suprise Iran is desperate to get hold of a nuclear weapon, it guarantees border security from an oil grab.


You really should try to keep up
spacebandit is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote