Quote:
Originally posted by farhad
Quote:
Originally posted by Wasted
Quote:
Originally posted by farhad
Quote:
Originally posted by potentialsuperstar
Quote:
Originally posted by farhad
Quote:
Originally posted by Wasted
BB7 is nothing compared to BB5. In BB5 the twists and Evil Big Brother were a brand new concept, a concept that tired by BB7. There were too many twists, and most of them were an anti-climax. There were far too many housemates, far too many newcomers. A twist happened almost every couple of days, it was very inconsistent to the original format for this reason. If someone had been watching Big Brother for the first time last year they probably would've been confused by the actual format, because the producers failed to stick to it because of too many twists.
The housemates were poor as well, some of them were very good but you couldn't honestly say that as an entire cast they were great, because they weren't. A series like BB5 had a great cast, because almost all of the housemates brought something to the show, even if you disliked them. There was an extreme lack of maturity from the housemates as well in BB7, and a lack of intelligent conversation. It got very boring coming up to the last few weeks.
There were too many people at the final night as well. They should've evicted two of the six during the final week, I think any more than 4 people is too much for a final night, because it seemed like that whole show, all the interviews etc. were crammed into a tight schedule.
|
\bb7 had lots of Drama and include the most entertaining housemate ever that is nikki Grahame, so deal with it.
|
Tracey, how did you get out of the house?? BB5 had lots of drama too, and the incident that is fight night
|
So why did it not win NTA, or award for contestants.
|
Does it matter? Pete won BB7, doesn't necessarily mean he was a great housemate, he most certainly wasn't. So just because BB7 won an NTA, doesn't necessarily mean it was a great series. And it doesn't necessarily mean Nikki was a great reality TV show competitor.
It's only a matter of opinion anyway, we all have our favourite series and we won't always like the same ones. 
|
Why didn't ITV judges create a NTA for best reality TV contender during BB5, and why isn't in this years category, this could be BB7 created these stuff because how entertaining it was compared to previous series, and that happened because of one person as we know who.
|
I'm just going to quote myself again;
Quote:
|
Does it matter? Pete won BB7, doesn't necessarily mean he was a great housemate, he most certainly wasn't. So just because BB7 won an NTA, doesn't necessarily mean it was a great series. And it doesn't necessarily mean Nikki was a great reality TV show competitor.
|
And who was Nikki up against for that award anyway? I know she was up against Pete, but almost anyone would deserve to win against him.
And surely you could explain why Nikki was a brilliant housemate instead of making references to the awards she's won?
They might not have thought of that award during BB5 anyway if they never created it back then. Simple as that. I'm sure if Nikki was up against any of the characters of that year, she wouldn't have won, but those housemates didn't have that chance to win the award like Nikki did, so you can't really use it to suggest she is a better housemate than any of them.