Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystic Mock
Sophie did all of that as well and was less interesting than Siavash, Freddie had become deeply unpopular by the end, and Marcus repulsed people, and the others? Nope.
And Nadia's win did see a ratings drop for BB6 on it's Launch Night and that can't be a coincidence.
And I don't mind having offensive people finishing elsewhere other than winning tbh as every time it has happened the ratings drop.
|
How do you know the ratings for BB6's launch dropped because of Nadia's win though? She won with over 70% of the public vote - a big landslide. So the majority of the public loved her. It wasn't a one-off divisive result like Helen's win for example, where it was extremely close between her and her opponent.
The lower ratings for BB6's launch could've been due to many other factors. Not necessarily because of Nadia's win. I mean BB5's launch only did well because it launched off the back of the last ever episode of Friends. I doubt it would've done as well if it launched at 8.30 the following Friday or something.
Pete wasn't really an offensive winner, yet BB8 still saw a ratings drop not only in its first week, but also as a series. I mean I get it launched months after the highly controversial CBB5, which probably contributed slightly to the fall in ratings. But Shilpa wasn't offensive either. Same could go to someone as inoffensive as Rachel Rice winning BB9, yet BB10 still saw another heavy ratings drop.
The only time the BIB could apply for is Helen's win where I wouldn't be surprised if people switched off because of the farce allegations etc. But I don't doubt that the fact that BB15 was also an awful series or people getting bored of CBB15 might've put people off BB16, hence why that suffered a ratings drop. As well as the awful scheduling or lack of promo for that series.