[user104658]

Originally Posted by Jack_

The BBC has been criminally underrated in this thread. MTVN pretty much nailed it but I think it's on near enough the same pedestal as the NHS in terms of what Britons should be proud of.

There is so much to it and there should be something for everyone: its sports coverage is unrivalled, its drama is excellent, documentaries are top notch and go further than a lot of commercial ones do since they aren't chasing revenue and ratings, its radio networks blow the rest of the market out of the water in terms of quality, well targeted programming, it covers festivals and live music events like no others and its news coverage is the most nonpartisan of all the mainstream broadcasters and arguably printed press in the country.

The arguments against that last point are incredibly tedious too. You have people on the right complaining that the BBC is has a lefty liberal hand-wringing champagne socialist Marxist agenda, while its critics on the left think it's a centre-right Conservative/UKIP mouthpiece. What does this actually tell you? That's correct, that it's neither...or rather both. Yes Nigel Farage gets a hell of a lot of screentime, yes there are plenty of examples of how the Tories were let off the hook during the election campaign and how Jeremy Corbyn faces criticism that David Cameron does not under similar circumstances, but so too has there been a number of documentaries about tax avoidance and underhand tactics by the government...where would you find these on a commercial rival in amongst the newest inflammatory documentary about immigrants on benefits with ten kids? That's because it goes back to my earlier point - the BBC can produce this kind of programming as it's not chasing after revenue and ratings to the same extent that commercial rivals are.

Subscription services suck too. Don't get me wrong, there has been plenty of good programming offered by streaming outlets like Netflix, and there is definitely weight to the argument that viewers should be entitled to watch things when they want, but do I want this to replace live, scheduled television altogether? No I do not, because there is still and always will be something exciting and in-the-moment about scheduled TV, an experience that can be shared by everyone viewing at the time. Perhaps it will become the distant past in the future, but I sure hope it doesn't for a long time, and I begrudge people who wish it along.

There are many things the BBC are doing wrong at the minute - taking BBC3 off air, peddling an age-specific mantra on Radio 1, arguably being a mouthpiece for the government - but the blame for all of these things can either be placed at the hands of the awful BBC Trust, or indeed the government of the time who oversees its status. Is it any wonder that the BBC appears to be in favour of the government in its news coverage when it faces such stiff opposition and a threat to its existence by those very same people?

I understand why some people don't or don't wish to pay the licence fee, and hell as a student I've tried not to pay it too (but when I have more money I won't care at all), so do I think it should be compulsory? Not really, but scrapped altogether? Absolutely not. We should be really, really proud of the BBC - for all of its historical shortcomings, it's an incredible British institution that offers so much to so many people around the world. The day that is replaced by a monopoly of ratings and revenue seeking networks with shouty news and tacky, sensationalist programming - will be a rather bleak one.

All you've really said here is that you like it and what it has to offer. I don't mean to be flippant here but... so what? I'm fully accepting of the fact that SOME people like it and would like for it to continue as the stealth-tax-funded behemoth that it is, but likewise, there are plenty of people who don't enjoy any of the content that's on offer and, given the choice, would happily do without the BBC. The only right, and fair, way to continue is for those who do want the BBC to pay to have the BBC, and those who aren't interested to pay nothing and do without the BBC. Via an optional subscription model.

The problem is, the reason it offers (supposedly) higher quality viewing than others is because it has so much funding. Funding that it would lose A LOT of if it gained that money through voluntary subscription rather than through extortion and threatening letters sent to people's homes.

Essentially what I'm saying is, how is it in any way morally right for everyone to have to pay for something because you happen to enjoy it? By all means, those of you enjoy it, continue to pay for it. I hope you continue to enjoy the content. Just please leave the rest of us who do not want or enjoy BBC content, out of it? Give us the option to not have to pay for your enjoyment?