Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherie
As I said above and seeing as you pay such close attention to my posts how could you have missed it? I didn't read the whole article, the point I made was quite clear but once again you have tried to make my point of lessor value than yours, for someone who is so right on you have a dim view of some women  |
I did see it, hence why I said 'if you choose not to' - which you have, and quite frankly don't you think you shouldn't really be partaking in a discussion about the agenda of an article when you've not actually read said article? Doesn't make much sense does it
Not sure why you're trying to make this an issue about women in an attempt to trash my character but okay. All I'm saying is that the Mail's agenda is clear as day for anyone who's read the article to see, maybe try reading it and then we can actually discuss it properly?