Quote:
Originally Posted by Dezzy
I understand more than you do, you don't even understand the fact that, like or it not, everyone is entitled to their Human Rights and you keep bringing up the tired ol' Terrorism example to reinforce to everyone how little you understand.
Everyone in this country is entitled to their human rights, it doesn't matter whether you like it or not, and that's how it should stay. It's not Human Rights if you pick and choose who deserves it. It's all or nothing.
|
you are wrong. Everyone has human rights, but when a terrorists kills 100s of people they deserve to be killed so save any future fatalities. The fact is the human rights have always existed and always been amended over time. british human rights are perectly fine. the eu human rights is too rigid too broad and due to this inflexibility it sees far too many serious terrorists to slip through the net. Thankfully the government has slowly brought the laws into line to try to deal with this relatively new phenomena of netwrok terrorism. Flexibility if the key and reacting to the changing circumstances. your hard line inflexible stance is extremely dangerous. there are always exceptions to every law. when a cop is chasing a man with a loaded gun who has already killed, that man does not maintain the same human rights at the exact moment, he has the right to give himself up or he dies.