View Single Post
Old 14-05-2016, 06:52 PM #4
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg! View Post
You really are not getting my point. It does not matter if someone's game could be ruined by the public. My point is that aspects from BBUS could add to the entertainment value of BBUK. Whether or not letting the public vote in evictions enables housemates to "play the game well" is irrelevant.
So then why did you say this?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomC View Post
^ You can't have a strategy based game and public decisions as well, like Jack said.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg! View Post
Yes you can?
You can think someone's game being ruined is entertaining - I don't necessarily disagree, but the point both of us are making is that you cannot make BBUK a strategic game if the overall control of who's evicted is left up to the public. That's what you disputed.
Jack_ is offline