View Single Post
Old 16-05-2016, 01:50 PM #4202
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LukeB View Post
@Jack_ How do you even know Cassandra wouldn't have beaten Kelsey in part 2 HOH... did you forget Kelsey won that by default? and don't forget the F4 veto comp..Cassandra was one minute behind Nick. Phil sucked at the last part of HOH so Cassandra could have easily beat him..and then Cassandra would have won BBCAN4
The only comp Cass won this season wasn't even by her own doing, and yes she may have been a minute behind Nick in the F4 Veto but let's not forget Kelsey struggled to find the last clue (which isn't a test of memory, just finding something), had she done so she'd have been in second

There was no way she was winning part one, and I still don't think she'd have won part two or three either. She may have studied but not nearly as much as the brothers or Kelsey did, even if Phil did suck in part three

And again, Kelsey was never going to keep Cass. People can keep peddling this 'Tim should have quit for Cass' all they like, but it wasn't his Veto, he wasn't voting...it's not up to him. The brothers, Kelsey and him made a pact and her loyalty was evidently not going to waiver so Cass wasn't going to make F3 ever. Had Tim or Cass won the F4 Veto, at least one of them would have been guaranteed F2 and they would've won this season
Jack_ is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote