View Single Post
Old 31-05-2016, 05:34 PM #22
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. View Post
Why would they go to the effort to overhaul all of the studio sets if they want it to fail though?
I though this too but then I realised that the studios and new house aren't just exclusively for the civilian series, they're for CBB too. It doesn't mean they are injecting money into BB per se, just the franchise overall. Clearly they see a future, but whether that includes the civilian version who knows (my guess - no)

It does beg the question though, what is the ****ing point of spending all of this money on an extension and promising big changes to the format, if you're then not going to promote the hell out of it? Seems like a gigantic waste of time and money if you're not at least going to try and get it to pay off.

I don't think they want it to fail, they just don't care if it does, because it will only give them more of an argument to eventually axe it
Jack_ is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote