View Single Post
Old 08-07-2016, 03:05 PM #1
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Babayaro. View Post
You see, the thing is with this is that a lot of feuds/rivalries that go on for a long time tend to become tiresome and dull to watch, like Helen/Ashleigh's series long one. If both Charlie and Jason stay then this is just going to drag so much and for me it got boring after a few days of Charlie moving into the main house. I prefer these feuds to be cut short (an exception on some of course) as it allows room for new ones and for house dynamics to change.
But what's the point taking a gamble on other housemates coming to the fore and new feuds developing when there's already one right in front of you? Half of the time they never materialise anyway so it was pointlessly detrimental

The more Charlie pushes, the more Jason is going to come out of himself and erupt which let's be honest is the entire reason the producers put them in the house together anyway. Their storyline is causing discussions and making them both contribute, Jason was doing nothing before the houses merged

I just find all the side taking series after series silly. Sure, have opinions on who is and isn't in the wrong but once you want one of them evicted you're kind of killing the debate and ruining that housemate? It's so counterproductive
Jack_ is offline