View Single Post
Old 03-08-2007, 01:59 PM #43
Wasted's Avatar
Wasted Wasted is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,105
Wasted Wasted is offline
Senior Member
Wasted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,105
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Son_Of_Ziggy
Quote:
Originally posted by Wasted
Quote:
Originally posted by Son_Of_Ziggy
Quote:
Originally posted by Wasted
Quote:
Originally posted by Son_Of_Ziggy
Quote:
Originally posted by Rocko
Quote:
I'm sorry, I'm very disappointed in these "reasons". But then, I just saw your age so I don't expect you to understand. .
What does age have to do with the ''argument"?
Saying that snoring is a big reason why he's a bad person?
Again, you misread my post, they were reasons why he annoys me, doesn't mean he's a bad person at all. Surely to make someone "crash and burn" you'd have to at least read their post, then make a constructive argument without bringing personal matters into it, before you go against what was said in it? You have failed miserably to do any of that so far.
Good luck in your life is things like snoring and hearing a hoody annoys you to the point of hating someone...reality will hit you one day, in a few years time, when you've had a chance to grow up.
Again, you continue to make yourself crash and burn by not actually reading my posts. You asked me to give reasons why he annoyed me, and I did. They're just small things yes, but they annoy me but it doesn't mean i "hate" him for it. I don't even "hate" him and I never said that.

I can't believe someone who is bringing personal matters into a discussion instead of making this an enjoyable debate is actually attacking my age as if they are so much more mature.

You can't even defend Ziggy properly so you bring my age into and you criticise me. Lame.
I wrote a long post explaining why your reasons were wrong. I went down the "enjoyable debate" path and you just brushed it aside...which isn't at all mature. I looked at your age and now it makes sense why you cannot hold a constructive argument. It is my OPINION (you like people to have opinions, right), that in a few years time with the benefit of experience, you will realise your mistakes.

End of dicussion. I win.
No, you wrote a long post explaining why you disagreed with my reasons, not that they were wrong. I stuck to facts, facts about Ziggy that annoy me, and you can't deny facts, so they weren't "wrong" at all. Not only do you deny facts so blindly, but you also make them up and you say that I "hate" Ziggy, when I have never said that I "hate" Ziggy.

I only brushed it aside because you brought my age into it. Your post lost it's credibility (because you did make good arguments before then) when you made it personal. I can hold a constructive argument because I haven't made it personal at all, so I have stuck to the rules of the forum, and I have kept the topic about Ziggy, whereas you are trying to make it about me, my age, and my future, which quite frankly is none of your business and is not related at all to how I argue my case.

And if someone's age was related to how they conduct themselves in a mature, mannered debate, then I'm pretty sure that I'm older than you are.

As for this winning thing. You keep throwing around the statement "I win", and I honestly think that you're just saying it for the sake of saying it, and that you believe that saying enough times will make everyone believe it. Won what, exactly? Oh, but I suppose you will excuse yourself from answering the question yet again (which we already know is that you have won nothing anyway) by saying I'm going off-topic when you were the first to stray away from the topic of Ziggy in this discussion.
Wasted is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote