View Single Post
Old 24-07-2016, 04:54 PM #21
smudgie's Avatar
smudgie smudgie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: God's own Country
Posts: 25,433

Favourites:
BB18: Raph
X Factor 2013: Abi Alton


smudgie smudgie is offline
Senior Member
smudgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: God's own Country
Posts: 25,433

Favourites:
BB18: Raph
X Factor 2013: Abi Alton


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vicky. View Post
Well I disagree with this entirely tbh, same as I disagree with smoker costing the NHS. They may cost more during their lifetime, however overall, no. Reasoning? They die younger so need less 24/7 care with age related illnesses. 24/7 care for years costs way more than the cost of the odd operation or whatever
Yes indeed Vicky.
The same as all the tax smokers pay on a packet of cigs, over a lifetime it will more than pay for any treatment they may need in later life. Plus they will take less pension etc as they will have a shorter life according to what we get told.

Last edited by smudgie; 24-07-2016 at 04:56 PM.
smudgie is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote