Quote:
Originally Posted by Yaki da
They never said the one with the most votes would be the only one safe or the two with the most votes would be the only ones safe.
The 2 previous evictions the person with the fewest votes has been evicted. Unless they specifically stated otherwise why should voters think it is any different this time?
If you are going to do what they are doing then you need to inform voters BEFORE the lines open. That is what they do on I'm A Celebrity. If you're voting for a challenge you are told BEFORE the lines open that the top 2 will do it.
Or if you're voting for people to stay in and there will a challenge between the bottom 2, they tell you BEFORE the lines open.
If they did not do this, they would get themselves in trouble. As the code states...
2.14 Broadcasters must ensure that viewers and listeners are not materially misled about any broadcast competition or voting.
It is legitimate for voters to feel they have been misled here. How could they be anything other than misled when they don't tell us what we're actually voting for until hours after the lines have opened?
|
It's no different to freezing the vote and saving the top 2, the person who was bottom could get a rush of votes from fans of the top 2 who want the other one out thereby changing the result, I don't vote anyway so I couldn't care either way