Quote:
Originally Posted by smudgie
As its vote to save then I think it is fair enough.
|
No it is not, unless they tell us that only 2 of the 4 are going to be safe. They did not do that. They led people to believe that the person with the fewest votes would be the one evicted.
That is misleading the voters.
People clearly believed that. Chloe had been a huge favourite to go today. It is now very close in the odds. There could well have been insider trading.
Quote:
|
No more unfair than allowing the three saved housemates to have killer noms.
|
What goes on inside the show is up to the producers. They CANNOT mislead viewers on a phone vote. That puts them in breach of broadcasting standards.