[Ammi]

....I don't have time to make anything other than a quick post but it's interesting though because it can't all be a 'society construct' if 'male' and 'female' have been 'defined' pre-society and back in the beginning of man days...the hunter gatherer and the carer/the dominant and the submissive and etc...and then the evolvement of wearing clothing/fashion and 'expected' of male female clothing and behavioural 'society norms'/the provider the nurturer etc.... but that's all just an evolvement in society forming...?...and I do think that society is responsible for much unhappiness and the struggles etc but not the cause though....if someone as isolated from society from birth in an experiment, I will think that they would always be who they are...that I think is evident..(for me anyway..)...in those 'non-societies' and tribes, which have always so far as we know, had 'twin spirit' or 'two spirit' people in terms of sexuality, which hasn't always been understood or identified but has always been there ....societies pressure, societies judge, societies cause unhappiness and people not feeling free to be who they are but societies don't cause..?...


...anyways, just an initial thought but I don't have time to give more thought to it atm....