Quote:
Originally Posted by bitontheslide
but these are polls, which doesn't necessarily equate with public opinion. Sorry, but evidence of accuracy is there for all to see in recent elections in both the USA and here in the UK. If you don't want to acknowledge that, that's fine. I'm just curious why you would want to discard a poll as a useful indicator though. What purpose does that serve? Would you rather be ignorant of trends? Do you want to believe there can only be one possible winner, no matter what evidence is presented to the contrary? I find it intriguing.
|
Let me word it a different way for you
You need 270 areas to take control
Clinton has 169 pretty much secured and an extra 55 are likely
Trump has 97 pretty much secured and an extra 23 are likely
Thats 224:120 with 194 unclear areas.
It doesnt matter that Trump is nearing Clinton in popularity polls, because, that is not how the winner is decided.