View Single Post
Old 06-10-2016, 02:07 PM #18
Tom4784 Tom4784 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,095
Tom4784 Tom4784 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,095
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie89 View Post
Interestingly further down the article it says this...

Attorney and community activist Kim Akins said she is worried about what happened.

“No one wearing an American flag button, no one wearing a crucifix or a Star of David would be removed, so why this particular statement bothered him so much is bothersome,” she said.

The judge said his ruling is based on Supreme Court case law in which a judge can prohibit symbolic political expression in courtrooms, even if it’s not disruptive.

“There’s a difference between a flag, a pin from your church or the Eagles and having a pin that’s on a political issue,” Milich said.


So a patriotic or religious pin for example would have been fine. I don't see the point in needing her to remove it, personally.
She's got a point. if you're going to enforce something like this than it needs to be all or nothing. It just makes the judge look like he was singling out BLM.
Tom4784 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote