View Single Post
Old 01-11-2016, 01:39 PM #4
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dezzy View Post
Supporting Trump just doesn't make much sense, there's not really an argument for him that holds water. Hillary could gun down a school and she'd still be a better candidate.

He has no political knowledge or skill, his policies are both weak and unrealistic and he'd likely be Russia's puppet. Let's not even get into the business of his party being divided over him or the HUGE fact that he doesn't believe in the democratic process as he basically said he won't accept the result when he loses.

He is a child.
The argument appears to be that Hillary has been involved in "dodgy" political activity whereas Trump has not... conveniently overlooking the fact that Trump has not been in the position to be involved in said activity, as he has only recently become involved in politics. If Trump had been a politician for decades, do we imagine that he would be this "squeaky clean boy scout"? Hmmm. Hillary has a closet full of skeletons like every other high profile career politician. Is this ideal? No, but it is "the norm", and as bad as "the norm" is... Trump is just not the answer. It's like the US voters are trying to put out a fire by throwing petrol on it.
user104658 is offline