Quote:
Originally Posted by joeysteele
I am rather confused that there was any difficulty in understanding my statement.
Since I myself included no quantifying at all of the comment because like everyone else, I do not know how many voted that were in fact who could be termed not informed.
Hence no figures of any quantity even as to minority, half or majority in my post at all.
Just as I equally, which is why I also included both for leave and remain in my posts, have no idea if the minority, half or majority, of remain voters voted remain with the full knowledge of the workings of the EU itself either.
With respect neither have you or anyone else as to that.
Also finally, the abuse I mentioned did happen, not 'may have happened', it did,since I was on the receiving end I know it did.
I was hammered on here accused of being someone who pestered people and invaded their privacy by canvassing knocking at their doors during the EU referendum, a duty I and hoards of other people were supposed to carry out as a part of a canvassing team.
Just to mention one instance.
You didn't see it, so you just say maybe it happened, it did happen.
I balance my views on here whenever can, I never need to make anything up.
However,I have held back as a member on here but the getting at done on here,jumping at any little thing for whatever reasons,is a turn off.
Some are getting a raw deal just for who they are on the forum, that is sad to see anywhere, not just on this forum.
So I felt the need to defend someone today just as it seems you did too.
Except no insults were flying from me as to all their posts on any of the points I made or raised.
|
Yeah,When i said 'it may have happened' I wasn't doubting that it did.Maybe i worded that incorrectly.I do believe you that it did and i don't think you make anything up.I often enjoy and learn much from your posts.I was just saying that I didn't see it.I also try and stay out of all the drama and bickering on here(i get enough of that irl from the misses

).However i believe you Possibly misunderstood or misrepresented Kirks post in saying he was trying to have some kind of 'monopoly' in knowing people on the leave side from all different backgrounds when this was not the case.He was simply refuting an imo underhanded dig at leave voters.
Anyway i'm sure we'll all be warring about some other issue in a few weeks and then CBB.It's all entertainment.