Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier
"Members of the trust interviewed a number of witnesses about the incident"
Ffs LT, that's from your own link. Selectively choosing to cut it out of the part you chose to quote, because it doesn't fit in with your preferred narrative, doesn't mean it's magically deleted from the article too [emoji23].
|
so they say but they carried out this "investigation" without once speaking to the accused so draw from that what you will. They were happy enough to lie to members of the public about the clock so adding a few "extra" ear witnesses seems right up their strada.
or do you agree that he should not have been involved?