Quote:
Originally Posted by Withano
The independent statistical analysis made by the man who wrote the publication determined that the questions was unreliable. All of his interpretations are based from an unreliable survey and he acknowledges this. The article you provided in your original post does not.
The article you used was not legitimate. There were countless issues in the researchers method. your article made zero references with any of the many flaws in the publication. It was a biased article by somebody with a similar mindset to you. This person completely skirted arounf the facts of the publication to further his mindset.
I have never heard of the website before, I can take your word for its reputation. This individual article, however, horse****. Undeniably.
|
Yeah think you pretty much said this about twice already - what is this Groundhog Day or something or do you just like the sound of your own words.
