Quote:
Originally Posted by Dezzy
I asked a simple question, if any of this is true how has he avoided any consequences despite half of his party, the conservatives and basically the entirety of the print media baying for his blood on a daily basis? You can link all the stories you like about Corbyn being an alleged Terrorist Sympathiser but that's not going to change the fact that he hasn't faced any consequences for apparently having these dangerous stances and allies which does more to suggest that the stories are overblown then it does to prove their authenticity.
If all the stories were as they said, Jeremy Corbyn would have been forced out of the party decades ago, nevermind being in contention to run the whole thing.
Until this discrepancy is sorted out then the validity of these stories are in question.
|
Denial, pure and simple.This is the thing in a democracy. We had a previous PM that had an affinity with pigs heads, it didn't stop him being PM.
Democracy is great, but it does throw up the possibility of dubious people getting in to positions of power (I won't mention Mr Trrrr
)
Edit: I believe the reason Corbyn is an option now was because Margaret Beckett felt it would do no real harm to have another option in the leadership contest so seconded his nomination while completely disagreeing with him and his principles.