Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier
It's perfectly reasonable to point out that something needs to be done about the super rich buying up property in urban areas and letting it sit empty when urban space needs to be properly used. That's fine. That's a valid political point to bring up. Later.
The idea that families should simply squat in vacant properties is utterly ludicrous to the point that I don't even know where to start. It isn't feasible, it isn't practical, it isn't secure for the families themselves... The list of problems is endless and Corbyn KNOWS that, he knows it isn't realistic, he is making a CHEAP political point exploitatively at the expense of hundreds of suffering people and dozens of dead. It makes me really ****ing angry and if it isn't making other Corbyn supporters angry then... Yeah... I'm sorry but you ARE being blinkered and biased. What he and others are doing here is mercenary and repulsive.
I saw it days ago on the main thread about the fire and was poo-poo'd away, "it's not political! Everyone is united! You're wrong TS"!
As usual I was not bloody wrong and it's exactly the petty political sh**show on all sides that I said it was.
|
I saw it days ago on the main thread about the fire and was poo-poo'd away, "it's not political! Everyone is united! You're wrong TS"!
sorry who said that is would not get political?