View Single Post
Old 09-07-2017, 09:51 PM #11
jennyjuniper jennyjuniper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 4,050
jennyjuniper jennyjuniper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 4,050
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad View Post
Don't really know much about this Jenny But if police did indeed attempt to get the names and addresses of people who ordered the magazine I would question the legality of that. That would sound very much like a police state attempting to control peoples' thoughts under pressure by religious leaders and left-wing propaganda.

I did note however that in a case (Mosque of Paris v Val 2007) where a French mosque Took legal proceedings against the magazines chief-editor, Phillips Val, based on three cartoons, one depicting Muhammad carrying a bomb in his turban, he was acquitted with a finding that it was fundamentalists, rather than Muslims, who were being ridiculed in the cartoons. And rightly so. We really can't allow this kind of extreme religious sensitivity dictate how we think and express our thoughts.
I agree. It's a world gone mad when people can be murdered over a bloody cartoon.
jennyjuniper is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote