 |
Virtual Biscuit Eater
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: The Future
Posts: 2,351
Favourites (more):
CBB14: Audley CBB 11: Speidi
|
|
Virtual Biscuit Eater
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: The Future
Posts: 2,351
Favourites (more):
CBB14: Audley CBB 11: Speidi
|
OOOH that is such a hard choice
Don't like either of them
Sam has never done anything to make me think 'yes i like him'. Seems pretty basic, up for fun but a bit boring. Possibly a bit untrustworthy.
Andrew is probably a more interesting person to talk to. He has been over-dramatic of course. I also don't like the way he baits people and then when they respond, he acts all 'super-offended' and runs off crying.
He seems very good at starting arguments/provoking people. When Joe didn't want to talk, Andrew kept pushing. Then when Joe finally took the bait, Andrew acted as upset as possible to make Joe look as bad as possible. This is like using victimhood has a weapon in an argument. People do it all the time and it is a really underhand thing to do. Especially when they have started the argument!
So i think despite being the more interesting person, Andrew does NOT deserve the £15,000 because of his sneaky style of arguing.
I don't like Sam but at least he hasn't been provocative or 'a professional victim' like Andrew has.
So by default, £15k to Sam.
|