View Single Post
Old 29-08-2017, 06:39 AM #7
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Brillopad Brillopad is offline
User banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 6,121
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dezzy View Post
It's a factual statement.



Do you see any options for preferences on what kind of Brexit the voter would prefer?

The referendum itself wasn't a vote on whether Brexit should be hard or soft but that issue dominated the last election. Do you not agree that the choice of party in control of the government and negotiations would affect what kind of Brexit we'd get?
No I don't see any options for preferences because there weren't any. It was clearly a LEAVE or REMAIN decision.

Where does it stipulate on the form (or anywhere) that the vote was a first stage of the process to be followed by another vote to determine the details i.e. What type of Brexit people wanted a hard of soft? Where did anyone question that BEFORE the vote?

That load of 'bu****it' was added afterwards by those desperate remoaners who had smugly assumed the remainers would get it and we're completely unprepared for a leave win. They desperately started to bash their undemocratic little heads together to come up with a way out. If they are allowed to get away with that it will have serious implications for all future public votes and the 'democratic' process in this country.

Last edited by Brillopad; 29-08-2017 at 06:58 AM.
Brillopad is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote