Quote:
Originally Posted by Vicky.
Ahh right I see [emoji23] Yeah didn't think of it that way round
Should still be a disabled and a gender neutral though. Disabled people are less able to wait (generalizing obviously, not every single disabled person) which is why I also have a huge issue with able bodied people using disabled loos in general, totally ignoring the other issues
I would personally be happy for all loos to be gender neutral in the years to come. As long as they are proper stalls, ceiling to floor rather than the pitiful things we have now where sometimes you can see the other person.
How would more women have an issue and be affected by it being neutral and disabled though? I don't get that? Looks like the womens is already neutral? Might be totally missing the point again though like just now [emoji23]
|
Another reason why it's better to have it merged with the mens rather than the womens haha [emoji14]
I meant by that that if it was gender neutral and disabled, then all able bodied women would be affected (in having to share with men), whereas in this case only disabled women are affected. (I'm not saying disabled women's feelings are less important, I'm just talking purely about numbers, and that if they're trying to please the most people - which they probably are with them being a business, then this way would make sense. If some people are going to feel uncomfortable regardless, then have it so as few people feel uncomfortable as possible.) The way it currently is, the womens isn't neutral.