Quote:
Originally Posted by Niamh.
No I don't think he should be guilty, I'm saying just because he's not found guilty doesn't necessarily make him innocent. Why should I automatically believe him over someone who said they were abused by him?  |
Because there’s no evidence?
Anyone can say anything.
The problem with TV stations and Parliament etc is that any Tom,Dick or Harry can phone in and say some **** and they’ll suspend the person accused straight away pending an investigation.
And then even if it gets to court and there’s no substantial evidence you still get the “no smoke without fire” crew condemning them for life.