[user104658]

The problem here is two-fold... 1) the fact that it's possible to do this in the first place, and 2) that the officer quite blatantly fired needlessly and prematurely. AGAIN I can only assume that the police weapons handling training and psych evaluations are dangerously inefficient. How can the officer involved possibly claim to have perceived a threat? There was no threat - and the officer who was speaking hadn't even finished what he was saying before the first shot was fired. Madness.