Quote:
Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet
You obviously have no clue about armed response or law enforcement to make such a ridiculous statement
|
The death of Magdiel Sanchez a deaf man
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41351249
Walter Scott shot for a traffic offence
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-42259256
Police in Miami have defended the officer who shot an unarmed behavioural therapist, saying he missed his actual target – a man with learning difficulties.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a7149791.html
Police shoot homeless man who was illegally camping
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tpAZObNZfI
When you factor in that SWAT may not even have the correct address due to
dispatch error, on route map error, hoax calls (over 400 swatting events have happened this year) then there has to be a huge police liability issue here. It's the premature fatal shooting of an unarmed man unconnected to any report, regardless of real or hoax; prior to any confirmation of any actual threat. The police are not combat troops but that's how they too often behave.
I know you can see no wrong in American policing. I mean ****, you never even passed your thoughts on to the dead man and his family
