Quote:
Originally Posted by Ammi
..I have to say as well, I do find it personally quite heartbreaking with jet, when his personal experiences and pain are so obvious in ‘anti Corbyn’ posts...and he’s asked for ‘proof’ when that ‘proof’ is right there in everything he writes of his thoughts...and I do understand the need for ‘absolute proof’ also...but there are so many of us who have shared painful, emotional experiences in our lives over time and we can all relate and we can all feel and we do relate and we do feel... but ‘proof’ isn’t always asked for on other topics beyond Jeremy Corbyn...the ‘lack of objectivity’ as it were, isn’t always attached to and applied equally either...
|
Not to open up things I've withdrawn from.
I would always want to know as much substantiated proof someone had intentionally supported fully,terrorist activities and the murders of innocent people, before I would declare that as proven fact.
Just as with sexual abuse allegations on issues or indeed any other very serious allegations being made against anyone.
Even the MPs expenses scandal, I would make no condonement of,until the full official investigation from authorities found some responsible on.
I fully support anyone's thinking and I get regular abuse for my position in political thinking now.
I however join in as to any serious allegation making against anyone as to very serious crimes without full,substantiated proof that has come from official investigation as to for example Corbyn and subsequent charges as to same.
The fact,there is none,not a jot,from any official sources,parliamentary watchdog,police or the courts will never see me entertaining anything other, than the allegations being a personal view or feeling,rather than being presented as full actual indisputable fact.