View Single Post
Old 07-02-2018, 04:16 PM #14
Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,723


Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,723


Default

I get what you are saying jet.

Can you explain what exactly you mean by

Quote:
Can a mod make it clear what the future policy on the type of thread like the Ree Moggs one is going to be please?
This though? What kind of thread? Like, an actual discussion thread about his voting record for example?

I think maybe, I might just start deleting threads that are not clear about what they are about and have absolutely no thought gone into them too. So that thread would probably be gone. As would the many many threads that literally just have a link to a news story in them and nothing else. Like, if you want to discuss that news story, discuss it? No need to just make a title and post a link with maybe a little quote of what they story says. Add your own actual opinion to it.

Would people be happy with this btw? As I don't want to be doing it for people to still moan

As as I can see it, if this is done, then it would be fine to delete the random 'but what about Corbyn' 'what about Mogg' or whatever, as obviously your actual opinion would need to be given in reply to the OP, rather than one word/line (sometimes snipey) posts.

Basically, how would people feel about serious debates actually being serious debates again. With one word/one line stuff pretty much gone completely and discussion threads actually being discussion threads rather than snipey rubbish?

I may make a thread about this, as many will be avoiding this thread as they think that its yet another Corbyn argument going on

Last edited by Vicky.; 07-02-2018 at 04:18 PM.
Vicky. is offline