|
Triumph of the Weird
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 6,973
Favourites (more):
BB19: Anamelia CBB22: Gabby Allen
|
|
Triumph of the Weird
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 6,973
Favourites (more):
BB19: Anamelia CBB22: Gabby Allen
|
If moderating to the letter is going to be too difficult (which it sounds like it will be), I think stick to public warnings and thread locks.
When you're deleting threads and posts for simple rule breaks like being off-topic, you're leaving things open to interpretation.
I think just a simple warning to tell people that that is not considered on-topic and to get back to the OP's post will suffice. The people who would be annoyed would be satisfied to see this public warning posted and well--if the thread crashes... then thread lock.
The OP should have the most control I think. They should be able to say, this is the discussion I want to have--within these parameters... I don't want to discuss XYZ, I want to discuss this issue and the merits/non-merits of it. This creates an equal environment since people who are right-leaning can have as many threads as they'd like about conservative topics and so can left-leaning folk with social justice topics... everyone is happy, as long as they keep to the OP.
Last edited by Maru; 07-02-2018 at 04:50 PM.
|