Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie89
Thinking about the kink thing more, I wonder what the aim of it's inclusion is? Because with most/all of these things it's probably about bringing them more into the mainstream (rather than being about rights) I'd guess, but should kinks be mainstream? There's probably even a lot of sub categories with kinks so I'm not trying to say it's all the same, one of my friends (and his husband) are actually really into this stuff and have a 'kink room' and there's nothing wrong with it, but some of the stuff is definitely anti social, some of it's about causing pain, and including it in the LGBT thing is sort of putting it in a social arena, isn't it? When really it's about acts that you carry out in private. Unless I'm missing the point of it. (also if kinky were to become 'normal' then it would no longer be kinky  ) I also don't really like how it makes LGBT+ seem more about sex rather than being about sexuality/gender |
i think what they are trying to put forward is that kinky people are born kinky and its not a conscious choice that they have ... but doesn't everyone have a degree of kink in them to some extent..... it could be something as simple as liking leather, it doesn't need to be pain, bondage and humiliation
