[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

It is so wide now that it covers nearly all people on earth, which means realistically the whole thing is pointless. Asexual people, how the **** are they discriminated against? Noone is going to beat you in the street for NOT having sex. its just ridiculous really. And I mentioned on a thread recently about this 'Kink' push to be added, again thats stupid 'Kinky' people should be being 'kinky' behind closed doors, so noone would even know they were 'kinky' and if they are practicing their kinks in public or involving members of the public against their will then they are a bit sick and should not be expecting for their behavior to be considered 'normal' (I guess part of 'kink' could be having sex in public or something though...ugh). Look at all the stuff thats included under 'kink'..basically anything besides having sex with the lights off in missionary 24/7

https://www.glamour.com/story/a-to-z-kinks-and-fetishes

And as Niamh said last time this was brought up...age play is creepy as ****.

Everyone seems to want to tell the world about their fetishes. And I think its really wrong to be associating LGB people with simply having fetishes to be quite honest. I would add T on there, but many many of the group currently under the transgender umbrella ARE simply fetishists. So I would say that associating gay, lesbian, bi and transsexual (and intersex) people in with fetishists it pretty wrong. And transsexual needs to be transsexual again else transsexual people are lumped in with fetishists both for 'transgender' and the LGBTALPHABET.

People just want to jump on this to prove how apparently discriminated against they are, and its silly.

Also, so many of my gay friends find queer very offensive. It seems to be mainly the younger generation who have decided its an acceptable term.

Tea!!