[Ammi]

...actually..maybe they had the ability to calm their minds in finding Madeleine gone...I do think there was ‘story telling’ and has been storytelling as the analyst said...but I don’t think that storytelling necessarily indicates the extreme of having harmed her in anyway...either intentionally or unintentionally...maybe more, a calming of their minds and self thoughts to realise ...they could be prosecuted for neglect in leaving Madeleine in the apartment...they could lose the other two children, they could lose jobs etc...because they did feel their own responsibility of her being taken../...they left the children alone...so the storytelling of painting ‘good parents’..would or could be because of their guilt and the potential consequences ...


...although the analysis stuff is interesting...I am I think still in the vein with LT with this...if there was pre- thought in that there was intention to harm her ...then why choose somewhere they had no knowledge of in concealing her body...that wouldn’t make sense to me...that they would or could be so sure to immediately say ‘she’s been taken’...that’s also surely something a parent would never say or think unless it was truly believed...that a body wouldn’t be found because there was no ‘knowledge of guilt’...of having harmed her...but there was knowledge of having left her ...so a knowledge of the potential consequences and impact of that....

...if it was unintentional...as in she came to harm because of the ‘neglect’...then that would take some thought processes of confidence to conceal her body also ...of a concealed area they could be sure of and with panicked thoughts...to be able to say in an immediate reaction..’she’s been taken’...being in such an unfamiliar place would indicate that statement and that reaction were believed as well...


...obviously there are other things as well that wouldn’t make sense if they had harmed her...intentionally or intentionally...why for so long have they kept the focus on...if they had successfully ‘covered up’...the focus could still surely discover her body..(...if they believed she was dead..)...


...I do agree that ‘disappearances’ are often connected within family/friend circles etc...the ‘known person’...those are the higher percentages with these things...and because of that, we become conditioned to ‘suspect’...and start to analyse ourselves...The media had Kate smiling etc shortly after Madeleine ‘was taken’...that’s hard to connect to feelings we would expect to see...but For someone so ‘intellegent’...as to have concealed Madeleine’s body in an unfamiliar place and to be ‘storytelling’....why would she then behave in the exact opposite way to apparent grief..?....that doesn’t make sense in my thoughts...she can remain controlled, they both can remain so controlled ...but couldn’t even ‘contol grief’ in their immediate public appearances....hmmmm....when we’ve seen other cases of child disappearances ...that ‘storytelling grief’ has been a big thing in concealment with many or most cases...but not with Gerry and Kate...


...anyway I haven’t read any of the files etc...but for there to be the evidence of blood etc in the places there were...then there seems to be a lot missing for two ‘medical people’ to have not paid attention to in removing obvious ‘evidence’...and yet be supremely confident that a body would never be found ...to be able to state so absolutely..’she’s been taken’...