Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier
Which would be fine if I'd suggested "a jury of random peers except they have to have a degree" but that's not what I said at all  . It would be a jury of professionals with some insight into the area of each specific case; so for example, doctors, psychiatrists and mental health professionals in a rape case... forensic psychologists and criminologists in a murder trial... economists and business analysts in large fraud cases, systems analysts and web experts in hacking cases, etc. etc. |
What... on a jury, not as an expert witness to give some insight into how the crime was committed?
The extension to all fields encompassing all crimes is a new one, again I don't see how a professional perspective on a case is collective enough to make a decision as to innocence or guilt on.