Quote:
Originally Posted by LukeB
No.
who cares if two floaters are final 2, the moves have been meh this season and winning comps isn't that important for the win, social is important more than comp wins and if one of them had a better social game than the other then they deserved that win.
|
Only having a "social game" is what makes for terrible, rotten seasons. Why do they even bother having comps at all? They should all just have a group orgy and vote out the worst lover each week.
Only having a "social game" means you're never in control of your own destiny - let alone any group of people you keep promising to "have their back". It's embarrassing watching these type of weak morons float around deluding themselves that they're in control of what's happening. Even if I despise floating garbage, I can at least have a little respect for any player who makes it clear that
this is all they have, as it's almost certainly their only shot at winning. The trouble is most are
not content to be seen in such a way. So they start trying to take credit for any/every move that happens..pretending they're "throwing" every comp(so convenient) etc.. and all it ends up doing is make them look desperate and pathetic. Paras being the perfect example.
If all you have is pure social then fine, but
OWN IT. Tell the jury members that's all you had and that's what ultimately got you sitting there. Paras to jury members: I couldn't win jack sh!t and floated my way through the game. But come on guys, did anyone suck ass as good as me? Jurors: Fair point. Also, we were dumb enough to believe your sweet pea bullsh!t crying routine. So here's the 100k.
What's up with that? Everyone is honest and we move on.